Marjanishvili Theatre

Lela Ochiauri

“Wait Until Dark”. Anuki Khidesheli

Anuki Khidesheli’s Wait Until Dark (based on the screenplay by Frederick Knott) is a psychological crime drama built on a system of metaphors, unfolding in an atmosphere of psychological and physical tension. It takes place in the conditional, enclosed world created by the director, a world with its own dimensions, rules, and contours. As the laws of the horror genre require, the fear-inducing mystical and mysterious events increase from episode to episode, and the atmosphere becomes more and more charged. Consciousness, subconsciousness, doubt, reality, and imagination are intertwined, and the boundary between them is difficult to decipher. The events are constructed with precise psychological calculation and possess a powerful emotional impact.

This is a performance about the fate and life of a vulnerable and helpless person left alone in the face of violence, and about the possibilities and abilities that one must discover within oneself.

“Terror”. Temo Kuprava

Temo Kuprava’s Terror—based on the play by Ferdinand von Schirach—is a creative/social project, a “courtroom drama” about personal choice, which also implies the involvement of society.

 

The action develops according to the “plot” of both the dramaturgical structure and the course of the court proceedings—in its form, motivation, and order. Only the case itself is unusual, atypical, and therefore difficult both to conduct and to decide. That is precisely why the verdict must be delivered by the audience, “appointed” as the jury, guided by their own morality, heart, and reason. And they must answer the central question—who has the “right,” in a crisis and hopeless situation, to take upon themselves the fate of human beings—to sacrifice in order to save.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Maka (Marine) Vasadze

The Underground Man (Theatre Workshop 42)

Director – Levan Tsuladze

Music Director – Zurab Gagloshvili

Assistant Director – Tamar Pruidze

Choreographer – Tinatin Tsuladze

Digital Art Designer – Levan Geliashvili Eredeli

Cast:

Nika Kuchava, Nina Lortkipanidze

One of the best directors of the middle generation, Levan Tsuladze, became deeply interested in the stage adaptations of the works of the pre-existentialist Fyodor Dostoevsky in the 21st century and created several productions based on them. I believe this is not surprising in a century filled with political and social upheavals, wars, and one that calls into question the very essence and existence of human beings. This century is probably the most ruthless, heartless, pragmatic, and the era of ignorance and the rise of little people. At least its first third certainly is. During his tenure as Artistic Director of the Marjanishvili Theatre, in 2016, together with composer Vato Kakhidze, he staged BEGALUT – In Exile, based on the works of Sholem Aleichem and Guram Batiashvili, combining the techniques of non-verbal and dramatic theatre. Among other themes, through the example of the lives of two Jewish families, he raised the issue of violence, specifically the genocide of Jews in Russia. It was there that he used Dostoevsky’s text for the first time. One of the characters reads to Russian soldiers from a newspaper Dostoevsky’s (as astonishing as it may seem, an actual excerpt from a published letter included in his collected works) portrayal of Jews as enemies of Russia and his call for their destruction. It is noteworthy that neither the playwright nor the director translated this excerpt from Dostoevsky’s letter; it was performed on stage in the writer’s native language. This was the only verbal passage in the performance, followed by the brutal assault and physical annihilation of Jewish families by a Russian general and his entourage.

Later, the director created a trilogy in which he explored the problem of violence. What gives rise to violence (its causes), who the perpetrators are, why they become perpetrators, and why they develop the desire to oppress, humiliate, and kill others. Personally, I perceived this trilogy as a series of productions directed against violence towards women (although, according to the director’s concept, not only against violence towards women). Violence against women is, unfortunately, a global problem. In 2021, together with Temo Kuprava, he staged one part of the trilogy based on Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment.

A person of constantly restless creative nature, the director is always searching for something new. Three years ago, he opened yet another new theatre – Theatre Workshop 42. Here he staged Shakespeare, Strindberg, Gogol, the historical production 1921, about the occupation of Georgia by the Red Army, stage adaptations based on famous films, and others.

 

At the end of the spring of 2026, based on Dostoevsky’s novella Notes from Underground, he staged the two-person performance The Underground Man. The first act is, in fact, a one-man performance in which actor Nika Kuchava, following the task set by the director, with great professionalism, combining the Georgian tradition of psychological theatre with the principles of interactive theatre (the audience being the primary addressee of his active monologue), creates the character of a man consumed by nihilism, a man who no longer believes in anything or anyone, who is possessed by fears, for whom the destruction of the world and chaos are the cornerstones of his worldview. He is inadequate, having lost every human quality, including the most important one—the ability to love. He is a small, frightened little man who does not live but merely exists. He is an intellectual, yet his intellect is of no use to him; terrified, he has hidden himself away in a hole. He insists that there is nothing good in the world. In the second act, he meets a young woman (Nina Lortkipanidze). A feeling seems to spark between them; although sexually incapable (or so he believed), he even develops desire. Yet the nihilistic intellectual extinguishes with his own hands the spark that should have burst into flame. In the hopeless world surrounding us, there is no longer any place for love. He cruelly humiliates and rejects the very person who represented his last hope of turning back toward life. In the novella, the girl is mostly silent, and her character is not fully developed. In the performance, however, the young woman’s character is, one might say, entirely the product of the imagination of the director and the actress; together they gave this character her stage life.

 

 

Diary of a Madman (Theatre Workshop 42)

Director and Set Designer – Levan Tsuladze

Costume Designer – Nino Surguladze

Music Director – Zurab Gagloshvili

Assistant Director – Tamar Pruidze

Cast:

Nika Khrikuli / Zuka Papuashvili, Nika Kuchava, Duta Skhirtladze, Nika Gogidze, Anuka Grigolia, Ana Vasadze / Mariam Gvinianidze, Teona Kokrashvili

Levan Tsuladze has brought the works of the genius writer Nikolai Gogol to the stage on numerous occasions. Years ago, at the theatre Sardafi on Rustaveli, which he founded together with like-minded colleagues, he staged Gogol’s The Nose, and for the second time at Theatre Workshop 42 (premiere: late March 2025). In 2014, based on Diary of a Madman, he created a co-production between the Marjanishvili Theatre and Emilia Romagna Teatro Fondazione (Teatro Fondazione, Italy). In 2026, the premiere of Diary of a Madman took place at Theatre Workshop 42.

I believe that the director’s repeated return to Gogol’s work has both objective and subjective reasons. Nikolai Gogol, Ukrainian by origin, occupies a unique place in Russian literature and culture in general. His works resemble no one else’s; they are original and distinctly his own: phantasmagorical, enchanting, realistic, humorous, at times sarcastic, sometimes absurd, and contemporary in every era. Gogol is an exceptionally meticulous chronicler of Russian everyday life and the Russian mentality. At the same time, the events, stories, and human types found in his works—their character, inner nature, and actions—can be applied to any country or society.

Under autocratic rule, monstrous state institutions, corrupt officials in high-ranking positions, and, against this background, small, decent, dream-filled people who gradually lose their sanity in the jaws of this “monster,” withdraw completely into the world of dreams, trying to escape from bitter reality.

Levan Tsuladze’s first staged/adapted version of Diary of a Madman (2014) was enveloped in a more romantic atmosphere. As always, the director’s work was distinguished by humour, inexhaustible imagination, creativity, and an unrelenting aspiration towards goodness. With subtle touches, he revealed the tragedy unfolding in the human soul, caused by inner emotional experiences.

This time, in the production staged at Theatre Workshop 42, the director stripped the performance of all romanticism, while preserving Gogol’s characteristic phantasmagoria and confronting the audience with harsh reality. Poprishchin’s tragic end is not solely the fault of the state institutions; before his downfall, he is led there by society and by those around him, whose counterparts, unfortunately, are all too numerous among us.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Theatre for Young Audiences

Tamta Kajaya

Magdana’s Donkey

Nika Chikvaidze’s Magdana’s Donkey, through a contemporary visual expressive form (without violating the classical text) and semantic language, conveys the main message of the performance. While the literary work depicts the tragic fate of a widowed woman, the performance presents a generalized critique of social injustice.

The production clearly demonstrates how injustice destroys the poor and the powerless, while the “law” appears to be the same for everyone, although all of this is merely apparent and conditional. In the performance, the director does not focus solely on the story of the impoverished mother and her children—rather, he generalizes the theme and develops it on a broader scale. We see the individual within the system, on the path called helplessness and vulnerability. Through a modernized form, the director conveys and reveals how human justice loses its face and turns into a mechanism of control.

It is no coincidence that, in the finale, the judge is represented by a puppet, which makes the following clear: a puppet possesses neither feelings nor empathy; it has no responsibility or independent opinion. Consequently, we understand that it is a figure controlled by others, one that merely carries out the system’s predetermined instructions.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Theatre Workshop 42

Zaza Sopromadze

The Underground Man

Based on Dostoevsky’s famous, in a way programmatic, novella, the performance, following the literary source, aims to explore the deepest and most concealed layers of the human inner world. The performance is, above all, the confession of a fallen and degraded individual before himself first, and then before the audience.

 

Distinguished by its expressiveness and inner dynamism, the production reminds society that within every person there exists a phenomenon carefully and deeply hidden from others, and that the “underground man” may well be dwelling within the inner world of each one of us.

© 2026 All Rights Reserved